<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | pinchy_ | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/pinchy_/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/pinchy_/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for pinchy_.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 05:42:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e62e254128851a07c4864a2c6643e47a</guid>
				<title>pinchy_ replied to the topic De-facto relationship property agreements in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378130-de-facto-relationship-property-agreements/#post-4503038</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:58:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another similar question:  I&#8217;m also in a defacto relationship and I&#8217;ve just purchased a property in my name only, and I was wondering what would be prudent to do to protect the property if the unlikely breakup occurs?  The hardest part about a pre-nup or similar is answering the difficult &#8220;if you loved me you wouldn&#8217;t be asking me&#8221; question!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 250/347 queries in 0.074 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-15 15:45:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->