You are getting 50 SPAMS a day ? Aren’t you lucky. [:o)]
Many people are getting three times that many.
Just goes to show you everything is relative.
The solution is rather simple.
Firstly prevention :
1. This isn’t quite 100% foolproof as it is possible for ‘them’ to invade someone else’s Outlook Express’ addressbook and copy the addresses…[Read more]
SMTM, have had a similar problem as yourself recently.
(door smashed etc).
If your garden area was disturbed (read ‘ruined’) I think they deserve to receive a bill for the damage.
If the tenant is working you will get compensated eventually even if you need to gop to court (which they in all likelyhood won’t be attending anyway).
>>I also believe that the Libs need to be given a rest at Federal level now as they are also too arrogant.<<
I agree that it isn’t a bad idea for a government to get a wake up call every now and then so that they keep in mind that they are the public’s servants rather than being the lord of the manor.
The obvious reason for excluding some of the rental income is because rental income by itself doesn’t tell us that one needs to take into account the vacancy factor for the properrty, the repairs, maintenance, rate and possible land tax charges, insurance etc etc.
So a lender who will only take say 80% of the rental income into account is doing…[Read more]
Most of the lenders depend on the mortgage insurer accepting the security.
If it is a city building and also if there are a lot of units in the building the insurer will only accept a certain amount of risk @ say 80%, then another lot at say 70% LVR and thence it may reduce to say 60% LVR.
The rent obviously is reflected in the purchase price.
I don’t know Melbourne but if you were serious about buying then I suggest you either check out the correct rental value for the unit or pay a valuer (independent from the seller) to tell you both the value of the unit as well as the rental value.
For heavens sake Richmond, I responded to Markpatric’s post in a rational manner.
I am genuinely very interested in the subject and the last paragraph, which you Richmond has seen fit to partly delete, was included by me because I wanted to make it clear to Markpatric that I am not hounding him, sending him up, or criticising him (at least not in…[Read more]
>>Maybe you could add to that “or to make others feel better or avoid pain<<
A very good case indeed can be made out for the fact that an altruistic person (i.e. someone who appears to display unselfish concern for the welfare of others) ultimately is acting in the way he is acting because it makes him feel good.
I know that one cannot afford not to have some emergency assets accesible in times of disaster.
Disaster ?
Well, here are several likely or unlikely scenarios : the Indonesians may invade Australia, the Muslims may stage a take-over in this country, the Queenslanders may invade NSW, a drought may cause food shortages,
problems elsewhere in the…[Read more]
I agree it is certainly not time to buy unless one knows what one is doing (being able to spot a bargain) AND one is capable to service the loan.
Where that places +ve cashflow properties I don’t know.
I guess people have to live somewhere so, provided one doesn’t go in on a shoestring (meaning ‘provided one has some spare cash as a back up),…[Read more]
I am not sticking up for the banks guys but the thought struck me : “If Credit Unions are so easy with their lending criteria doesn’t that place their money at a greater risk ?”
In other words, is one’s money on deposit in a Credit Union at greater risk than it would be in a bank ?