<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | Nate | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/nate/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/nate/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Nate.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b59ddd1347d0defa879d219fe1dd03ab</guid>
				<title>Nate replied to the topic Your PPOR: Asset or Liability? in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4386688-your-ppor-asset-or-liability/#post-4554037</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:04:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>Thanks for the great replies offering advice. It was particularly good to hear from those of you who have already done this and I now definitely think the idea bears further serious consideration.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b3e7ba37ba22b0108531e343b1f3dd56</guid>
				<title>Nate replied to the topic Still doable? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381350-still-doable/#post-4523910</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:48:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>Steve, your new newsletter format is a breath of fresh air! I&#8217;d say it was the most accessible and enjoyable newsletter for ages, so nice one!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty keyed up about the opportunity to be mentored by you, have just submitted an application. I bought your first book earlier last year, and took a couple of months to get started, but&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-201270"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381350-still-doable/#post-4523910" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8feb4cc3558439391b8a05cbaf103f8e</guid>
				<title>Nate replied to the topic Positive Gearers vs Negative Gearers in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4372135-positive-gearers-vs-negative-gearers/page/3/#post-4461694</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:34:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking at a recently rennovated unit, which if my offer is accepted will be slightly -ve CF to begin with, at a 15% or so premium to the market rent rate. (I&#8217;m hoping to attract a quality tenant with the renovations that have just been completed &#8211; new quality carpets and paint, kitchen surfaces &amp; appliances etc).</p>
<p>I hope that rental rates&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-256756"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4372135-positive-gearers-vs-negative-gearers/page/3/#post-4461694" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5cc8548908b8e6ba508ea1913e68d608</guid>
				<title>Nate replied to the topic Positive Gearers vs Negative Gearers in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4372135-positive-gearers-vs-negative-gearers/page/2/#post-4461692</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:06:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You CAN resell properties in Monopoly! At least, that was always the way I played it. Nothing as satisfying as buying the last of the green properties when someone else owns both of the others, then trading it to complete the oranges (statistically THE properties to own and develop with 3 houses each for a middle game victory &#8211; if you don&#8217;t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-246027"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4372135-positive-gearers-vs-negative-gearers/page/2/#post-4461692" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8f6e481c1ab5517d174988cfac94007f</guid>
				<title>Nate replied to the topic Anyone familiar with Elizabeth in SA? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4370826-anyone-familiar-with-elizabeth-in-sa/#post-4451296</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2004 00:23:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have no Ballarat equivalent in SA, and we don&#8217;t have the option of wraps to kickstart our investment funds into the range needed to invest in Adelaide. Can anyone tell me if Lease Options are legal in SA? Perhaps this is my best way forward. Or can I wrap interstate properties if I am a resident of SA?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Nate<br />
PS Hi Diane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6ec2f33aa9e32365ab3c9493a4f74aea</guid>
				<title>Nate replied to the topic Is there still + IP in SA? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4370418-is-there-still-ip-in-sa/#post-4447758</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:27:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you&#8217;re not going to give us newbies any hints are you Fibejebe <img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/smile.gif?x85685" width="" height="" alt=":-)" title=":-)" class="bbcode_smiley" /></p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, just a little nudge?</p>
<p>Nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ca580675e47ce4786cdd5f41114bfb92</guid>
				<title>Nate replied to the topic Anyone familiar with Elizabeth in SA? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4370826-anyone-familiar-with-elizabeth-in-sa/#post-4451290</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:20:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks bear and Westan,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve pretty much nailed Elizabeth! Rosewood estate was the first and so far only suburban renewal project to happen there, and I had also heard it was sparked by Jimmy Barnes&#8217; callous dismissal of his childhood stomping grounds.</p>
<p>Interesting that you were buying semis for $24k in 97, that would have been at least $15k&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-124452"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4370826-anyone-familiar-with-elizabeth-in-sa/#post-4451290" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b2755958cfe10fe44ea18d7490a15ffd</guid>
				<title>Nate replied to the topic Is there still + IP in SA? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4370418-is-there-still-ip-in-sa/#post-4447753</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:37:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also looking in SA, see my recent new topic post regarding Elizabeth. Maybe we could combine heads on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 7/354 queries in 0.115 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-17 22:17:40 by W3 Total Cache
-->