Total Members: 158,382

Nat R

  • Nat R replied to the topic Derivex in the forum Finance 18 years, 6 months ago

    Just too funny :)

    The claims about the loss of the master licence and the inabilty to sell sub licences speak volumes about what the Derivex business was all about.

    I’m sure ASIC and MIAA are very happy to have this continula slandering of their name…I guess the fact it is coming from somebody with absolutly zero credability means nobody pays…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Interest as income? in the forum Finance 18 years, 7 months ago

    Too true…but funnily enough ING offers one of the highest rates and is also has the highest rating of any bank in Australia….higher than any of the big four.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Interest as income? in the forum Finance 18 years, 7 months ago

    Further to the Fincorp story….look for more ASIC investigations into debentures issuers going forward

    http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byheadline/05-290+Fincorp+to+offer+millions+in+refunds+to+debenture+investors?openDocument

  • Nat R replied to the topic I/O payments on $100,000 in the forum Finance 18 years, 7 months ago

    If you are only paying interest it doesn’t matter if you take the loan over 1 year or 100 years ….the repayments stay the same.

    $100,000 x 0.066 = yearly repayment ….then divide by 12 to get monthly, by 52 to get weekly :)

  • Nat R replied to the topic STITCHED UP BY INTERSTAR in the forum Finance 18 years, 7 months ago

    When you say “friend” do you really mean “client” that you can’t get set through your broking business that is linked via the “www” button on your profile?

  • Nat R replied to the topic Westpac Cuts Fixed Rates in the forum Finance 18 years, 7 months ago

    Best place to find more info is to read a couple of the Pre Sales Reprost on the Standard and Poors Website.

    Note: if a bank issues a bond in its own name then the investors lose out if it goes bad. But if the same bank issues a Mortgaged Backed Bond then the investors are subject to the credit worthiness of the individual loans and the people…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic STITCHED UP BY INTERSTAR in the forum Finance 18 years, 7 months ago

    Has your friend tried this group:

    http://www.homesec.com.au/

    Their website is vague and their interest rates look to be very high but they were recommended to me by a fellow forumite …so they must be OK.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Jamie McIntyre in the forum Heads Up! 18 years, 7 months ago

    All advertisments for Guru courses seem to depict people walking along the beach talking on telephones…I always assumed this was becasue they had lost thier house due to margin calls and were sleeping in the dunes.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Westpac Cuts Fixed Rates in the forum Finance 18 years, 7 months ago

    Its all about the interbank interest rate swap market…nothing more nothing less.(plus a little bit of margin give up on westpac’s part)

    There is a traded market between the banks where they can “swap” fixed rate exposure for floating rate exposure.

    They all issue floating rate debt to fund truck loads of thier mortgage to the big super funds…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic US Finance in the forum Finance 18 years, 7 months ago

    Originally posted by grossrealisation:
    hi Qlds007
    It doesn’t surprise me its not just the banks.
    I sent a spread sheet to mcdonalds head office in dallas and asked them to burn a cd disk with what I wanted and send it back to me.
    They sent me the chair, air freight 10 days because nobody had a cd burner, when it arrived I couldn’t stop…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Agents acting in the interests of their vendor in the forum No Subject 18 years, 7 months ago

    Originally posted by munjy:
    Maybe I am being naive.

    However, getting a better price for your vendor, even if it means a delay of a phone call to a competeing bidder, means more commission for your agency and also for you.

    I would agree …you are being naive….if an agent gets an extra $5000 on a sale that is at best an extra $100 in commision…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic pipsinc.com- MASSIVE PROFITS in the forum Help Needed! 18 years, 7 months ago

  • Nat R replied to the topic CRASH!!!! in the forum General Property 18 years, 7 months ago

    10% is not a crash…nowhere does the bloke from JP Morgan use the term…so please don’t misquote again.

    Keep inmind that is less than 6mths gain in some recent years.

    As for the comments from the white shoe real estate agents…who cares what some two-bit salesman says when all he is after is headline exposure.

  • Nat R replied to the topic CRASH!!!! in the forum General Property 18 years, 8 months ago

    Every day I read economic research from the major Investment Banks (Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, UBS etc) and there is a big focus on the property market given the number of securitised loans in the money market.

    Without expception there are no concerns of a property market crash in any of the global markets.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Agents acting in the interests of their vendor in the forum General Property 18 years, 8 months ago

    They only want the sale….getting another $10,00 for the vendor hardly makes any difference to the commision the earn. Sometimes its not even worth making the extra phone calls.

  • Nat R replied to the topic Agents acting in the interests of their vendor in the forum General Property 18 years, 8 months ago

    Drop a note in the letter box of the house so the vendor knows what a sh1t job the agent has done….I had the same problem a few years back so I dobbed in the agent via a note to the vendor.

    A few days later I bumped into the agent in the supermarket and she went mental at me….looks like my note worked …and I got the result I was after !!!

  • Nat R replied to the topic Money or a Life? in the forum Opinionated! 18 years, 8 months ago

    Make that 29,000 again ;)

  • Nat R replied to the topic Money or a Life? in the forum Opinionated! 18 years, 8 months ago

    Originally posted by kay henry:

    I also read tonight (big reading night!) that John Brogden says he will axe 29,000 public service positions if he gets into power in NSW-

    kay henry

    Did he count himself in that number ?

  • Nat R replied to the topic Quizz – LVR percentage- R U COMFY? in the forum General Property 18 years, 8 months ago

    So many “what ifs” ….what if there is no crash , what if you don’t lose your job, what if you don’t haev to sell.

    While ever I have the ability to work I can service the loans and all is cool. I would hate to get to 90 years old and realise that I should have borrowed more through out mylife….its not like you get a seceond chance.

    I would…[Read more]

  • Nat R replied to the topic Quizz – LVR percentage- R U COMFY? in the forum General Property 18 years, 8 months ago

    Have been as high as 110% currently at 45% …moving to 85% soon.

    To be honest I don’t see why it is relevent….debt service ratio is the one that you need to focus on.

  • Load More

Nat R

Step 1 - 0% Complete

Fill Out Your Member Profile Below

Fill in the required fields below to complete your registration.

Registration not only grants you full access to this website, but will also enable us to send you our newsletter, latest investor tips, strategies and information about events/products relevant to investors. You can opt out at any time.

Used to log in to the website and for targeting with messages. Alphanumeric characters only. No spaces allowed..

Member Login
Lost your password?
×
158,382

Register Free To Unlock Unrestricted Access To PropertyInvesting.com

×
1-Day Millionaire Mastermind Workshop - Only LIVE Training in 2019!