<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | misguided_will | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/misguided_will/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/misguided_will/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for misguided_will.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">08b92390d72bc22b5fa9fa1db855b6fa</guid>
				<title>misguided_will replied to the topic SMSF Co-owner use in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5026371-smsf-co-owner-use/#post-5026425</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 23:35:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry,</p>
<p>Thanks for the suggestion.  I think the co-owner should be able to borrow enough against their existing properties to fund their 50% share.</p>
<p>Regarding co-owner use (actually a relative), assuming the house has self-contained quarters such as a granny flat OR is a dual key apartment, do you think their usage would comply with the SMSF&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-343046"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5026371-smsf-co-owner-use/#post-5026425" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d753dae097ec6a528c4817193b51376b</guid>
				<title>misguided_will replied to the topic SMSF Co-owner use in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5026371-smsf-co-owner-use/#post-5026381</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 06:57:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks terry</p>
<p>re &#8220;the property couldnt be mortgaged&#8221;, i was planning to use my smsf balance of $150k to get a loan to pay the smsf&#8217;s 50% share, meanwhile the co-owner/related party would arrange their own financing to pay for their 50% share.</p>
<p>To clarify, do you mean that the co-owner/related party can&#8217;t have their loan secured against their 50%&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-342995"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5026371-smsf-co-owner-use/#post-5026381" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bec6931d83bdac5c416bb2dfade1c9f6</guid>
				<title>misguided_will started the topic SMSF Co-owner use in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5026371-smsf-co-owner-use/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 04:29:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there</p>
<p>I&#8217;m considering purchasing a dual key apartment or house with a granny flat with my SMSF (50%) and a co-owner/relative (50%).</p>
<p>I know for a 100% SMSF property, relatives are unable to benefit/rent the property.</p>
<p>But as a co-owner, would they be entitled to use their half of the property which they own?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 323/348 queries in 0.092 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-15 14:21:54 by W3 Total Cache
-->