Keith, it sounds like you are either a) attempting to avoid giving even more of your income to an ex spouse, or b) you want to maximise tax benefits whilst still not actually ‘losing’ money. If I were you in this instance, I would stick with interest only loans, and have any spare cash sitting waiting ready to go.
Another option I like that Robert Kiyosaki talks about is to have the money to buy your car outright, but invest that somewhere that is positive cashflow. Then get a loan and use this cashflow to pay off the car. Eventually you either sell the car, or pay it off completely, and still earn money from the asset you bought.
You have to lodge the bond with the rental bond people in your state. I believe it is unlawful to keep it yourself – and if I am wrong, I am sure somebody will correct me.
Part of the reason you have to lodge it is so that you can’t just decide to keep it if you felt like it at the end of the tenancy.
‘Will lenders allow this or will they see it as an unnecessary risk? ‘ What’s the risk? If you are the director, and you are signing a guarantee anyway, it seems to me that it would just form part of that.
‘Also would this include the tax man?’ Don’t see why it would – you are just offering the ‘security’. There is no funds changing…[Read more]
Hi Luckyone, $300K in land value would mean that you have LOTS of houses, or that the houses you have are reaaaaaally expensive. I don’t think the ACT is any better – at least in other states you get some exemption up to a certain value. Not here. Plus my land values seem to be rising exponentially each year, therefore an increase in tax…[Read more]
Deborah, I’m guessing that you are referring to the fact where you have an interest only loan (you should if you have a PPOR loan – at least until it is paid off), and a LOC for your PPOR. You are then directing all income, rent etc. into the LOC. When the interest is due for the IP loan, it comes from this account. As will all bills etc. Is…[Read more]
I know we all hate cross collateralisation (no wonder people just write x coll![]), but one way to protect ourselves if we do have some in our own name is to use the properties outside of the trust as security for those being purchased in the trust.
This way, if you have the unfortunate circumstance of being sued, the person suing you should see…[Read more]
Celivia, it depends on if you’re redoing the kitchen, or just cutting some space out for the dishwasher. Or providing one that is on wheels.
I’m about to redo a kitchen in one of my properties – as a reward to the tenant (who’s a friend/workmate). I bought the place almost 2 years ago cos she was upset at work that she’d probably have to move…[Read more]
Not sure what you mean here madeinoz. When the real estate agents put ‘under contract’ over an ad or on the sign, it means that contracts have exchanged, but settlement has not yet taken place. Once contracts are exchanged, you cannot then buy it, unless something happens or there are ‘subject to’ clauses which are exercised by the…[Read more]