<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | Lucinda | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/lucinda/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/lucinda/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Lucinda.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 12:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">81cdd126ef024e5fbd288a6438de2cd0</guid>
				<title>Lucinda replied to the topic Bidding contest in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365434-bidding-contest/#post-4414216</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2003 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><span class="footerSize">quote:<br />
Gday Lucinda,<br />
so your decision to renege was nothing to do with the Agent? You changed your mind after the vendor accepted your offer becouse the risk of not getting the return you were after was too high ?  MITCH<br />
</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span class="default"></p>
<p>Yes it did also have to do with the agent.  We have not and will not purchase or sell a property through this agent.  The&hellip;</span><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-159143"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365434-bidding-contest/#post-4414216" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">586e3ee1209a83b2c519e0d5c95e2d81</guid>
				<title>Lucinda replied to the topic Bidding contest in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365434-bidding-contest/#post-4414211</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:51:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><span class="footerSize">quote:<br />
Gday Lucinda, l was wondering after your offer of 240K was accepted by the vendor,why you did not follow through on the deal ?  MITCH<br />
</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span class="default"></p>
<p>The property needed some major renovations (the renos would have costed about 50k).  My Husband and I felt that we would be over capitalising and the risk of not getting the return we were after was to high.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4e7a9c125f081cd6e34789faf8e925a9</guid>
				<title>Lucinda replied to the topic Bidding contest in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365434-bidding-contest/#post-4414208</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandi,</p>
<p>I understand the situation you are in.  6 months ago I made an offer on a property in NSW listed at $210,000.  The real estate agent told me that they already have a offer but the vendor and not accpeted it.  I made my offer of $205,000.  The agent told me that the other offer was higher and would I like to raise my offer so I offered&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-159135"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365434-bidding-contest/#post-4414208" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 237/349 queries in 0.082 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-16 22:42:58 by W3 Total Cache
-->