https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/harro43/activity/ Activity feed for harro43. Sun, 05 Apr 2026 23:35:22 +0000 https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1 en-US 30 hourly 2 619d2b873ee7c5d295f083d6314a51f0 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373471-borrowing-100-in-aus/#post-4471722 Wed, 05 May 2004 08:00:27 +0000 couple of figure to look @
borrowing 1.4 mill @ 7.5% = $105000 P/A
7x 225 p/w = $81900
shortfall of $23100
thus each partner would have to cough up approx $12500 each per annum approx $220 each per week claimable on tax as is the interest so progected tax benefit @ approx 30% is
loss $23100
interst$ 81900
detuctibles eg deprectation etc on…[Read more]

]]> 9b964d969a3a2609af53f8430e8875ab https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373471-borrowing-100-in-aus/#post-4471721 Wed, 05 May 2004 07:42:03 +0000 Hi jo
yes its a scary thought but with tax benefits and the historical data that suggests that property increases approx 10% P/A and the fact your having tenants paying your homes off is a great temptation I guess expected rental would be in the range of 200-235 per week per property my partner and I understand we would have to pick up the…[Read more]

]]> 268fd7c6d963b2c845025bd4d9454ea8 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373471-borrowing-100-in-aus/#post-4471719 Wed, 05 May 2004 07:25:17 +0000 we live in sth aus and the IP’ we are looking @ are between 170-200 thou I know steve recommends buying in rural areas but as I have just found out by buying an acre of land that the lenders dont like to lend against rural areas I had a couple of knockbacks due to it being rural..

]]> 4c8058e640bee9b68c0cf9d7d6433277 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373471-borrowing-100-in-aus/#post-4471717 Wed, 05 May 2004 07:15:42 +0000 thanks for your quick reply couple of things
1:would the 100000 against my home be as well as my partners 100000 therfore $200000 all up
@: this would only give us enough money for approx 7 homes @ 80% LVR how would we then acheive the needed finance for the next IP? I understand the 80% LVR because of mortgage insurance but wouldnt it be better…[Read more]

]]>