<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | Hardy47 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/hardy47/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/hardy47/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Hardy47.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 13:56:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">be652d3a362a96333e8d4af69f4957a9</guid>
				<title>Hardy47 replied to the topic Super or Property? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4366328-super-or-property/#post-4418775</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 12:14:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caz,</p>
<p>Remember that Super is just a vehicle for carrying various assets classes for investment, just because most super is in shares and so it is not doing well, you can usually choose to have your super in property trusts instead, which is easier and cheaper than using DIY super funds and all that they entail in administraion rules and time</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 313/347 queries in 0.075 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-14 00:32:25 by W3 Total Cache
-->