<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | Gordon B Gekko | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/gordon-b-gekko/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/gordon-b-gekko/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Gordon B Gekko.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c98b2670ae1f0e98f3dae2348cee89d1</guid>
				<title>Gordon B Gekko replied to the topic Negative Gearing vs Positive Gearing - with supported analysis in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4395775-negative-gearing-vs-positive-gearing-with-supported-analysis/#post-4601270</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:49:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, seeing as though i have had such an overwhelming response to this thread and such a warm and fuzzy welcome to my first post on PropertyInvesting Forum, I will simply summarize the above in the form of a simple question -NEGATIVE GEARING (EQUITY GROWTH)    <strong>VS</strong>    POSITIVE GEARING (CASHFLOW) &#8230;..quantitatively, which will yield the greater resul&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-104545"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4395775-negative-gearing-vs-positive-gearing-with-supported-analysis/#post-4601270" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a1bca13e359545039473a52486549df</guid>
				<title>Gordon B Gekko started the topic Negative Gearing vs Positive Gearing - with supported analysis in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4395775-negative-gearing-vs-positive-gearing-with-supported-analysis/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:13:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, my first post, hello to all , thank you for having me i jumped on today for the first time and a ran a couple of searches on cash flow vs capital growth (ie. positive gearing vs <a href="/negative-gearing-pitfalls" class="finpostlink" rel="nofollow">negative gearing</a>), the endless debate..This is an area that interests me greatly. After reading through many threads on the topic, there are people who put down some&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-300090"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4395775-negative-gearing-vs-positive-gearing-with-supported-analysis/" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 2/348 queries in 0.116 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-21 02:02:34 by W3 Total Cache
-->