<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | Flyingrally | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/flyingrally/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/flyingrally/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Flyingrally.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:14:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e1a9fc4bf7ed1047a2b135c1378698e8</guid>
				<title>Flyingrally replied to the topic OK so I finally found a cash+  property, but I am a bit worried. Is outback Australia a good or a bad thing ? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4401045-ok-so-i-finally-found-a-cash-property-but-i-am-a-bit-worried-is-outback-australia-a-good-or-a-bad-thing/#post-4630922</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:10:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone for the feedback. I am going to look further at vendor finance route. CheersSteve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7a57b94505b5bbfdd06f07acb1b41c68</guid>
				<title>Flyingrally replied to the topic Stamp Duty on adjoining properties in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4400934-stamp-duty-on-adjoining-properties/#post-4630194</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:36:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sro.vic.gov.au/sro/SROnav.nsf/v/D9C90CE2DFBAA2FACA2576AC0005E888/$file/DA-026.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sro.vic.gov.au/sro/SROnav.nsf/v/D9C90CE2DFBAA2FACA2576AC0005E888/$file/DA-026.pdf</a>will give you a better explanation. From what I can see though if the properties are advertised seperately and the purchase of one is not dependant on the other you will be fine.Stamp duty savings are significant. 5 x $130000 properties seperatly is s&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-43011"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4400934-stamp-duty-on-adjoining-properties/#post-4630194" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 2/348 queries in 0.087 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-10 15:25:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->