Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 3,401 through 3,420 (of 3,495 total)
  • Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Bec,

    Is it the best idea for me to move out? What is the next step do I move into the next one too and so on until I can build up enough equity to buy “my home” or is there an easier way to do this?

    As Terry indicated by living in the property long enough to establish it as your home (principal place of residence) you will have the advantage of this property remaining CGT free for 6 years after you move out. This can be a big kick along for your investment journey. Bear in mind you can, largely, only have one PPOR at any one time.

    As to whether or not is is the best thing for you to do – well that depends [:D].

    One of the downsides of owning (or buying) your own home is that the interest payments are not deductible and as such constantly upgrading to a bigger home can hold you back unless you can meaningfully use the equity as you move along the journey.

    But then you do have a place you can call ‘home’.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Amanda,

    Being a little bit lateral here – is it possible for you to sell your PPOR (ex renovation) and then move into your existing investment property and then classifying this as your new PPOR – no CGT.

    Don’t know whether this is feasible or whether or not the ‘numbers stack up’ but food for thought.

    Otherwise I tend to agree with the others on the proviso you manage that ‘bad debt.’

    To me there is little value (unless you absolutely have to) in selling an asset due to poor financial management if those habits only get you into the same mess a little further down the track.

    I appreciate this may be a little harsh and not pertinent to your situation but it may help in the long term. Apologies in advance if I am off the mark!

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Jeannie,

    Without knowing Heritage I can only post a copy of a response I gave to some else asking similar questions about another group. Hope these are of use.

    Some thoughts for you to consider.
    1. How long have Heritage been in business?
    2. How many investment properties does your ‘consultant’ own?
    3. How long has your consultant been investing?
    4. How does your ‘consultant’ earn their money?
    5. What will they get out of each and every purchase?
    6. What service do they offer?
    7. How much does it cost to use each aspect of their operations?
    8. Can you use your own mortgage lender? property manager? valuer? If not – why not (it is a free world)?
    9. What sort of after sales support do you get?
    10. Does their approach fit comfortably with you?
    11. How much pressure is bought to bear?
    12. Are all decisions made in Heritage’s presence?
    13. Are there rent guarantees? (Run away fast if there are!)
    14. How does the price compare to similar properties on the open market?
    15. ASIC/ Ministry of Fair TRading Issues?
    16. Where have Heritage’s past sales been? What were they? How much is the open market paying for them now? What are they rented for now?
    17. What are similar properties (to the one being considered) renting for? Check with a couple of REA in tthe area?
    18. What is the vacancy rate in the area like?
    19. What infrastructure is planned for the area?
    20. Are brochures high on ‘gloss’ and ‘glitz’ and low on facts?

    Just a few to get you started.

    At the end of the day only you will know what suits you and your situation.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Pousti,

    As Pisces has already indicated guaranteed rentals are largely built into the purchasing price and often are higher then market rent.

    As such this can make the cashflow situation somewhat rosier than reality.

    Definitely do you own research and check out the floor size of the apartment/unit. Some banks have been reviewing their lending rules for apartments due to their increased risk with a softening of the inner city unit market and you may not be able to secure an 80% lend.

    Other things to consider are how many other units are there in the building, how many other units in the area, how many are planned and what are the vacancy rates in the other buildings too. Some developers are offering rent guarantees so they can move their product.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Ken,

    1) is it true that if we buy a house and make repayments, the first 2 or 3 years’ repayments will be the interest part and thus we won’t have too much equity in the house?

    Yes – pretty much so – provided you are only making minium payments. I recommend you find a loan calculator and play around with the various options to see what each option does for you bottom line.

    http://www.realestate.com.au/cgi-bin/rsearch?a=loan&t=res

    2) is it a “bad” idea if we try to get a commercial loan to buy a business by borrowing against out PPOR house?

    Without knowing the ins and outs of your situation I would suggest the more distant you can keep the two loans the better off you will be.

    Definitely one for legal advice to ensure you and your home and business are as protected as much as possible. Given the implications of a wrong decision at this time – this is one that should be ‘checked out’.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Misty,

    If your numbers stack up and your income levels can service additional loans you have a potential $228K equity available for ‘deposits’ on other property.

    This figure is determined by adding the value of the two properties together (=$685K) multiply by 80% (=$548K) less existing debts (=$320K) = equity available of $228K.

    Note I am assuming the banks will recognise 80% of the value of each property – depending on their size and classification this may not, in the main, be entirely correct. The final figure may vary somewhat depending upon loan structures etc.

    All things being equal – hang onto them and follow your investment plans.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Lisa,

    Good luck with your search for a ‘mentor’ – you may also find it useful to read a few posts from some of the more knowledgeable people here (and who are in tune with your investment thinking) and send them a PM – they can only say no.

    You may also want to consider the merits of at least a couple of people this way you can have some checks and balances in the process.

    However, all said and done, ultimately the decision has to be yours.

    Good luck with the hunt.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    HI Chan$,

    It is interesting to see the discrepancies inpopulation statistics. My figure came from the Bogabilla website – I wonder if your figures include the whole postcode area – and not just the town itself.

    Invariably postcode areas in these places are very large and can considerably distort the population figures.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Leswon,

    In a round about way interest only could be considered ‘dead money’ as you describe it.

    You need to change your mindset about CG – you do not need to sell the property to realise the gain. It is possible to release the equity for other investments and/or cash. Ultimately it depends upon your investment philsophy.

    To give you an example – assume you bought a typical, median priced property in Perth in 1970 when they were $16000 and held it using interest only loans up until now when the median price in Perth has just reached $236000.

    Your debt remains at $16K and over the 34 years you have held it you have paid around $49K (all tax deductible @ $28/week) in interest on an asset that has increased in value by $220000. At the same time the median rent has increased considerably and would be making this asset positively geared.

    While $16000 was probably ‘expensive’ 34 years ago – today it is a little more than petty cash.

    Obviously in this example there is no consideration for repairs etc but I hope this clears up the benefits of interest only.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Celivia,

    Like Mel – I don’t think so either – but it may depend on how many IPs you own.

    It may be possible that someone recognised by the ATO as ‘being in the business of investing in property’ may be eligible – but I think not.

    Definitely one for your accountant.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Ken,

    I suggest you do a ‘google’ search on Boggabilla – this will help you determine whether or not the property is right for you.

    For me a population of 639 is too risky. The town itself is 769km north west of Sydney and can be found on the Q/NSW border near Goondiwindi.

    As I have said in another post – Steve also reinforces the need for the property fundamentals to be right – it isn’t just a matter of getting a cashflow positive property.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Simon, Russ and PG,

    Thank you [:D]

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Leswon,

    Was going to let someone else have a go at this for you but….

    Leveraging available equity off your existing property appeals most to me – this way you can (to a certain degree) have your cake and can eat it too.

    One of the first issues you will face is how much security a lender will recognise in your property. I am sure it will be considered ‘rural’ and as such they will not, in the main, recognise it at 80% – so the ‘gold mine’ may not be as big as you think. One of the brokers will confirm or reject this assertion – it is possible that some of the less mainstream lenders may go close to 80%. I’ll await their learned opinion too.

    Your long and short term goals will really determine what is right for you – with your short term goals being little stepping stones towards your long term success.

    A key question is what is it you want from your existing property – given it is 50 acres I am sure there are some ‘lifestyle’ considerations to be had that will really determine what you can/want/need to do. How much have you ‘outgrown’ your existing property? Is there further ‘outgrowth’ to be had? manage in the future? How long before you become ‘too old’ to manage 50 acres? Is this an issue?

    Do some research to determine what effect building a larger house or kit home will have on the value of your property. Consult local REA/valuers to get an idea before you committ to anything.

    Over capitalisation may hold you back for an inordinate amount of time.

    I cannot think of a reason for not using your equity to fund the ‘deposit and costs’.

    The alternative (apart from buying under value) is to save your hard earned cash. Bear in mind these savings are post tax dollars and for every $100K of purchase you will need $25K (excluding LMI) – how long will it take you to save $25K?.

    I use a broker who lives 400km away and I do all my business by phone/fax and email.

    Unless you are a ‘face to face’ person then it isn’t necessary to see your broker on a regular basis. I am sure the brokers who regularly post here would look after your loan interests as distinct from being qualified and/or legally able to give financial advice.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Russ,

    You, and the banks, need to include some consideration for vacancies – which is why (I suspect) most banks do not consider 100% of rental income when calculating loan serviceability.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Leswon,

    Loans can be altered fairly easily from I/O to P & I without any drama. I suspect the ‘bank’ would love you to change to P & I loans as they will reduce their exposure to you, and the loan is being paid off, albeit slowly.

    “If so, all money already paid towards the IO will also be taken into consideration and deducted?”

    There are no deductions to be made. If you have an interest only loan of $100K – you will still owe $100K as such all the payments made up until that moment only cover your interest bill.

    So your P & I payments will be based on the full $100K loan.

    Derek

    derekjones@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Leswon,

    There are a number of reasons why I use I/O for all of my investment loans.

    1) I use I/O only loans so that I can driect all of my spare cash into paying down my own home loan as quickly as possible.

    When the home loan is paid off then I’ll consider my options and explore the costs and benefits and options of paying off/down some IP loans (or not).

    2) Bear in mind that P & I loans, in the early years, have little impact on your overall debt levels as most of the payment goes towards the interest bill anyway.

    3) A I/O payment is less than a P & I payment. On a $100K loan @7% over 25 years your monthly repayment is around $706. Interest only basis it’s $583.

    Compound this over a number of properties and the cashflow difference is significant, to such an extent that it is possible to hold more in total asset value using I/O loans as against P & I loans.

    That’s what, and why, I am doing what I’m doing – in some respects it will get down to your plans, the approach you use and the properties concerned.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hey Lisa,

    My brain has an answer.

    Assuming all the properties were identical and bought today. A bit simplistic but you get the drift.

    you would need 500 properties
    you would have put in around $6m for deposits
    have total borrowings of $18m

    All for $50K/annum.

    Assume you held property to the value of $1m and it grew by 5%.

    5% of $1m = $50K.

    And if it were neutrally geared all at no cost.

    Just me being contrarian[:p]

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Ez-rent,

    We shall now all be extremely respectful of you and your comments – just in case Mrs Ez-rent enters the fray [:D]

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Leswon,

    As a quick calculator a lender will recognise (and lend) up to 80% of the value of your PPOR – income restrictions may come into play depending on the various numbers.

    Here is a little sum for you[:D]

    Value of home X 80% – existing PPOR loan = equity available.

    You will need around 25% of the total price of the investment property for deposits and costs.

    Buying an IP for $200K – you will need available equity of around $50K to fund the purchase of the property and to pay purchasing and borrowing costs.

    This figure can be reduced if you are prepared to pay Lenders Mortgage Insurance.

    Hope this helps.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544
    Originally posted by Inna:

    The accountant said that we’re better to sell than to rent it out as you’re better sinking your money into your PPOR than a rental house.

    As far as not renting the second one at all – just leaving it idle for 6 months – we had a friend do this – and apparently it worked out very well.
    Made more money than if he had rented out second unit.
    Wanted to check it out here though !!

    (Oh – long term goal – lots of develop/sell … develop/sell) – if at all possible [:p]

    Hi Inna,

    In the main I believe your accountant is right about getting rid of non-deductible debt from your PPOR.

    However (and without knowing numbers here) the two units may provide surplus cash to help pay off the PPOR too – this possibility, and it’s effect, need to be compared to the effect a lump sum payment would have on your PPOR debt levels and also your long term plans.

    Your friend made money leaving a property vacant – how much extra would he have made with a tenant? I can only assume there were CGT issues with the property for them to leave it vacant.

    As for your long term plans – have you thought about develop (keep some depending on the numbers) and sell the rest to keep debt levels manageable and cashflow working effectively for you in the long and short term.

    Be aware that, as a rule of thumb and according to Michael Yardney (an experienced, long-term Melbourne development specialist), developers coming along at the end of a boom are more likely to go bankrupt.

    So the message is make sure you do your research – developing isn’t a guaranteed formula – and you may well succeed. I do hope it works out well for you.

    Derek

    derekjones1@bigpond.com

Viewing 20 posts - 3,401 through 3,420 (of 3,495 total)