<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | cg76 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/cg76/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/cg76/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for cg76.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 18:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">106cac9e9fa8110c0cab9467892f0d69</guid>
				<title>cg76 replied to the topic 100% equity in PPoR and cash, how to proceed? in the forum Thanks for your comments,</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4396717-100-equity-in-ppor-and-cash-how-to-proceed/#post-4606501</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments, Terry and Richard</p>
<p>I ceratinly like the idea of an unencumbered PPoR and also would feel uncomfortable to spend all the cash on investment properties. We were thinking about 50 to 60%. The LOC could certainly be an interesting option. We will definetely look into that.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your comments.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 195/346 queries in 0.118 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-18 04:34:50 by W3 Total Cache
-->