All Topics / General Property / An old post, but well worth a reread.
Hi all,
This thought was straight out of Steve’s book “Millionaire”. I was scanning thru it and noticed I’d written the word GOLD in the margin, so I spent a bit of time fleshing out the idea Steve provided. As the title says, it is well worth a reread – the whole book of course, but also this post linked below:-
Let me know what you think, especially if you disagree ! ;)
Benny
Thanks for digging that post out again, Benny – the bit I keep coming back to is the test rather than the arithmetic: is the discount measured against what comparable stock nearby actually settled for, or just against the vendor’s asking price? If it is only against the asking price, then the whole return-on-cash case rests on the refinance valuation landing where you bought, which is really a bet on the location and the rent holding up rather than on the deposit trick itself. Before committing that much cash I would want three things written down: the vendor’s concrete reason for needing a fast, certain settlement, an independent rental appraisal supporting the income I am counting on, and a lender confirming up front that they would lend against that value. Miss any one of those and the bigger deposit is just buying a story, however good the arithmetic looks on paper. Great thought to have in the margin though – and asking costs nothing.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.




