All Topics / Forum Frolic / Tax bracket creep, and other interesting observations

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    With quite a lot of talk recently around “bracket creep” (Stage 3 Tax cuts etc) I decided to have a wee look at Bracket creep over time.  One particular page https://atotaxrates.info/individual-tax-rates-resident/historical-pre-2010-tax-rates/ was useful in providing some earlier years’ Tax Rates.

    As we do, I decided to record some of this for myself.  I’d allowed 5 ranges in my spreadsheet, based on the 5 levels we have today (Level 1 is 0 to 18.2k, level 2 is 18.2k up to 45k, level 3 is 45k up to 120k, level 4 is 120k to 180k, and level 5 is 180k and above).

    Imagine my surprise when I happened upon the 1991/92 Fiscal Year.  It had EIGHT levels, one of which encompassed just a $100 difference across its range !!!  Say wha?  No-one but a World’s greatest Treasurer could come up with something so mind-numbing !!!  Look here:-

    https://atotaxrates.info/individual-tax-rates-resident/historical-pre-2010-tax-rates/#Tax_Rates_1990-1991_Year_Residents

    Note the Tax Rate (Level 4) from $20,601 to $20,700 at 29.5cents per $1.   And then Level 6’s range was just $1000 – from $35k to $36k.  Talk about an Accountants’ nightmare.   My mind boggles at finding some kind of rational explanation for this effort.  Does anyone out there have some clue as to WHY this may happened at that time?   I wonder what the powers that be might have been smoking back then….

    Benny

    Profile photo of AlanritchsonAlanritchson
    Participant
    @alanritchson
    Join Date: 2024
    Post Count: 0

    With quite a lot of talk recently around “bracket creep” (Stage 3 Tax cuts etc) I decided to have a wee look at Bracket creep over time.  One particular page https://atotaxrates.info/individual-tax-rates-resident/historical-pre-2010-tax-rates/ was useful in providing some earlier years’ Tax Rates. As we do, I decided to record some of this for myself.  I’d allowed 5 ranges in my spreadsheet, based on the 5 levels we have today (Level 1 is 0 to 18.2k, level 2 is 18.2k up to 45k, level 3 is 45k up to 120k, level 4 is 120k to 180k, and level 5 is 180k and above). Imagine my surprise when I happened upon the 1991/92 Fiscal Year.  It had EIGHT levels, one of which encompassed just a $100 difference across its range !!!  Say wha?  No-one but a World’s greatest Treasurer could come up with something so mind-numbing !!!  Look here:- https://atotaxrates.info/individual-tax-rates-resident/historical-pre-2010-tax-rates/#Tax_Rates_1990-1991Roofing Contractor Northern Va Note the Tax Rate (Level 4) from $20,601 to $20,700 at 29.5cents per $1.   And then Level 6’s range was just $1000 – from $35k to $36k.  Talk about an Accountants’ nightmare.   My mind boggles at finding some kind of rational explanation for this effort.  Does anyone out there have some clue as to WHY this may happened at that time?   I wonder what the powers that be might have been smoking back then…. Benny

    It’s intriguing to hear about your findings on the 1991/92 tax brackets with their notably intricate levels, Benny! Such detailed segmentation in tax brackets could reflect attempts to target specific economic conditions or fiscal policies at the time. This complexity, while aiming for precision in taxation, likely posed significant challenges for accountants and taxpayers alike. For deeper insights into the rationale behind these detailed tax structures, you might consider exploring economic history resources or further archival tax records. This could offer a clearer picture of the fiscal strategies employed during that period.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.