All Topics / Finance / Investment in a relocatable home in a Tourist Park

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Profile photo of propertypowerpropertypower
    Member
    @propertypower
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 312

    G’day
    I am considering buying a relocatable home in a Tourist Park around Melbourne. The marketing company (for the tourist park) is offering 8% guaranteed net return on investment. The bank will lend 70% against the investment or up to 100% if another properrty is secured against the investment.
    Is there anything I would be wary of?
    Is there much capital growth in it, say over a period of 3-5 years?
    How is the market for resale?

    Any advice will be appreciated.
    Ta, Sanjiv

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Probably you will have a very hard time getting finance. Therefore you will also have a hard time selling. And this will most likely limit capital growth. 8% is not very much return at all.

    Terryw
    Discover Home Loans
    Parramatta
    [email protected]
    Sign up to my mailing list.
    Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe” in subject line.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of MortgagemanMortgageman
    Participant
    @mortgageman
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 164

    I will second Terry here and say that 8% is pretty poor for an investment such as this. There are many better commercial investments out there in my opinion.

    Kind Regards,

    Cameron Perry
    Director
    Perry Financial Strategies
    Level 13, 30 Collins St
    Melbourne VIC 3000
    Ph (03) 9662 1999
    Fax (03) 9662 2044

    Profile photo of mbutler2575mbutler2575
    Participant
    @mbutler2575
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 21

    Hi Sanjiv
    Are you buying the land and building? Or is it just the building and the park is to rent it out? I had a similar experience with a caravan park. I owned the caravan and the park rented it out. It was located on their land. It was a good return as I remember, about 40% but I could not borrow against it.
    At an 8% return it doesn’t seem enough to cover your costs and the building would depreciate as well. If you don’t own the land then there is little chance of capital gain.

    More due diligence required.

    Mark

    “Is this taking us CLOSER to our goal?”

    Profile photo of joelmcmahon8435443joelmcmahon8435443
    Member
    @joelmcmahon8435443
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 16

    find out why they want to sell these caravans coz it sounds to me like thay are trying to get rid of them

    Profile photo of AnitamarshallAnitamarshall
    Participant
    @anitamarshall
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 79

    The problem is that lenders cannot use the relocatable home as security so most lenders will only lend on them if they have a mortgage over the land (which obviously you cannot do in a tourist park). Therefore you would have to borrow using something else as security or a personal loan.

    Anita Marshall
    Advanced Finance Solutions
    http://www.advancedfinance.com.au
    [email protected]

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.