![]() |
![]() |
|
Positive Cashflow Propertiesbbpic [7 Posts] Hi all, Scott No Mates [3127 Posts] Several reasons spring to mind: I am opinionated. Take me at face value, read between the lines. http://www.reao.com.au/forum/entry.php?80-How-bright-is-your-agent bbpic [7 Posts] Sounds good. thanks. BanjoSmyth [44 Posts] remember that a positively geared property for someone else wont necessarily be for you. Obviously the longer you hold onto a property So eventually they will become positively geared. But when the property is sold the new owners will owe a higher percentage In the past I have people talk about their property that they are selling as being 'positively geared' and some people who are new to investing simply think it will be positive for them too :) besf of luck http://www.BanjoSmyth.com byron Sam [14 Posts] They either want to buy a better property, or want to cash up for whatever reason...other commitments etc...or it's not CF+ Byron Sam TCLinvestments [83 Posts] Or maybe they have too much money comming in, their pockets arent deep enough to hold!! by the way, im new here, is there an intro thread of some sort?? TCL Investments TCL Investments Looking to learn. Any mentors out there wanting a willing student? minichick [61 Posts] Maybe they have alot of money tied up in the property and can use it to build there wealth quicker rather then missing out on the extra 20% as most banks lend 80% of your equity for deposits etc and are making people jump through hoops if its for other business ventures Nothing to see here Terryw [11895 Posts] Just because a property is cashflow postiive doesn't mean it is a good investment. eg. it may be in a mining town with anticipated closure of a mine in the future. Terryw ryan mclean [477 Posts] Think about it this way. If I have $20,000 I can buy one property for $100,000 If that property goes up to $200,000 then I can sell it. I then have $120,000 and can buy 6 properties worth $100,000. This increase my rental growth and my capital growth because I am now receiving it on 6 properties not just one. yoyo galaxy [78 Posts] We bought a nearly unit in sydney before the market boom, it was a mortgagee in possession because the previous owner bought it brand new at peak of the market, now he can not afford the payment. basically this guy paid at least 100k more than the price we paid and it was negative gear for him. |
User loginActive forum topicssoooo Who here ownes property in USA ? Author: RickH WANTED... Cashflow For Kids Author: SteveMcKnight Recent blog postsHSBC anticipates more cuts to cash rate Author: SteveMcKnight 'Modest easing' recorded in house prices Author: SteveMcKnight Join Our Facebook CommunityWho's onlineThere are currently 4 users and 258 guests online. Online usersToday's TipYour deal's in trouble if the difference between making and losing money is <more> |
|